1Muséum d’histoire naturelle de la ville de Genève, 1, route de Malagnou, 1211 Genève, Suisse,
2IHSM, Toliara, Madagascar
3CEDTM-Kelonia, Saint Leu, La Réunion, France
4Association Caouanne, Cogolin, France, email@example.com
Located at 15 to 65 km off the shore of Maintirano, the Barren Archipelago consists of 10 small islands. All these islands are less than one km2 in size and six of them are covered with vegetation similar to the one found on the mainland. Because of their isolation, these islands are relatively preserved and little is known about their flora and fauna. These islands also provide important reproductive and foraging habitats for marine turtles. Two of the five marine turtle species that frequent the waters around the archipelago nest on the wild beaches of these islands.
Formerly exploited by fisheries and the extraction of guano, these islands are now frequented only by Vezo fishermen, who set up their camps for periods lasting from a few days to several months. The semi- nomadic Vezo community originates from the south- west coast of Madagascar and currently populate most of the littoral zone along Madagascar’s west coast between Toliara and Mahajunga.
In October 2005, the Muséum d’histoire naturelle de la ville de Genève, with financial support from the Réseau Universitaire International de Genève (RUIG) and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and with technical support from the Institute of Halieutic and Marine Sciences (IHSM), initiated a program called “Melaky miaro ny tontolo andriakany” meaning “The Melaky protects his marine environment”.
The initial objective was to reduce the local consumption of sea turtles and their eggs. Three main axes were developed to conserve local biodiversity: monitoring, raising awareness, and the identification and implementation of development and conservation strategies adapted to the local context.
Turtle monitoring is carried out by a team of four local fishermen, which uses a capture protocol inspired by a Vezo technique. Between 30 March 2006 and July 23 2009, 1288 specimens were captured mostly on their foraging grounds but also during nesting activity. Forty-one fieldtrips were carried out with motorised pirogues that lasted on average about 60 hours (10 days), strongly depending on meteorological conditions. Turtles were tagged with Monel Tag from National Band and Tag Co. (MAL2001 to MAL3603 with the address of WWF BP 738 Antananarivo 101, Madagascar), curved carapace length and width were measured according to standard protocols (IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group), while species, sex, and potential pathologies or marks were also recorded.
Five species were observed during the study (Chelonia mydas, Eretmochelys imbricata, Caret caretta, Lepidochelys olivacea and Dermochelys coriacea). Capture numbers quite closely followed the relative abundance of the five species around the archipelago (Chelonia mydas 95.2%, Eretmochelys imbricata 4.5%, Caretta caretta 0.2%, Lepidochelys olivacea 0% and Dermochelys coriacea 0.1%). Only green and hawksbill turtles nest in the Barren archipelago (Rakotonirina, 2008), while loggerhead (Caretta caretta), and olive-ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea) can be observed near the coast (the latter are sometimes caught in the shrimp fishery). Leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) are only found in deep water off the continental shelf.
The study recorded a high prevalence of tumors on captured turtles (Figure 2), suspected as fibropapillomas (FP). This concerned 16% percent of the 1225 green turtles captured (During the capture, special care was taken to separate healthy individuals from those which had tumors).
Tumors were observed only in immature green turtles with a curved carapace length between 40 and 80 cm, with a maximal prevalence in individuals between 50 and 59 cm (Table 1).
These observations are similar to those reported for Australia (Limpus & Miller, 1994), Hawaii (Marakawa et al., 2000) and the east coast of the United States (Foley et al., 2005). Before frequenting coastal areas and remaining within benthic habitats, small immature turtles spend the first stages of their life in pelagic habitats, where FP seem to be absent. Concerning the absence of FP in mature turtles, it would seem that only the healthy individuals survive or those, which managed to overcome this disease (Foley et al., 2005).
In the majority of the turtles recaptured, the progression of the tumors could be observed. However, in nine individuals we observed a regression of the tumors, as indicated in Table 2.
The distribution of the disease within the archipelago is very uneven (Table 3). Turtles captured around the islands near the coast (Nosy Maroantaly and Nosy Marify) had a much higher prevalence of the disease (nearly 25%) than those captured around islands close to the external slope of the continental shelf (Nosy Ampassy, Nosy Lava, Nosy Andrano, Nosy Manghily, Nosy Dondosy and Nosy Abohazo; 0 to 1.5%). However the distance between these groups of islands is less than 20 km.
The water surrounding the islands close to the mainland (Nosy Marify and Nosy Maroantaly) is generally rather turbid. Its visibility – especially during the rainy season – is sometimes less than 2m, because of the significant volume of sediment transported by the rivers. It is possible that there is a link between the presence and quality of this sediment and the observed appearance of tumors in sea turtles.
Table 2: Observed cases of tumor regression in Chelonia mydas immatures of the Barren Archipelago.
0: no apparent tumor; 1: tumors of less than 1cm in size, generally found around the eyes; 2: many tumors present ranging between 1 and 4cm in size; 3: tumors greater than 5cm in size, present on all soft parts of the body; in the latter case turtles were typically slim and their carapace was covered with algae.
Various explanations have been put forward for the cause and origin of this disease: infectious agents (Aguirre et al., 1994a), response to a parasitic trematode (Dailey & Morris, 1994; Aguirre & Balazs; 2000), pollution affecting the immune system (Aguirre et al., 1994b; Aguirre & Balazs, 2000), presence of dinoflagellates on the sea-grass bed (Landsberg et al., 1999; Landsberg, 2002), and the presence of Ozobranchus parasites in marine turtles could act as a disease vector (Greenblatt et al., 2004).
Compared with Hawaiian studies that found greater prevalence in heavily urbanised areas (Aguirre, 1994), pollution could be excluded as a cause for the observed disease in the Barren Archipelago because the region of Melaky does not have any industry.
According to local fishermen, this pathological condition has existed since the 1970s, but the number of turtles affected has increased greatly. The recent over exploitation of sharks in the region for the trade with shark fins could be a cause for the observed increase of affected turtles. The larger shark species are important predators of immature turtles. By eliminating individuals that are most affected by the disease, they might play a significant role in controlling the development of the disease. Close to the slope of the continental shelf, these sharks are more abundant and, hence, predation is more frequent. This might explain why the disease is located around the islands near the coast. The spatial attachment of immatures with their foraging habitat (Taquet et al., 2006) might also limit the spread of the disease.
The limited geographical distribution of the disease in the Barren Archipelago, and observed cases of disease regression, mean it is important to develop specific research programs in the Barren Archipelago. In particular, to help better understand the origin of the disease and its evolution, and also to understand tumor regression.
We thank the research team of this project of the Geneva International Academic Network (GIAN), Switzerland; Danielle Decrouez and Andreas Schmitz, Muséum d’histoire naturelle de la ville de Genève (MHNG), Switzerland; Volker Mahnert, Department of Zoology and Animal Biology, Faculté des sciences, University of Geneva (Unige), Switzerland; Man Wai Rabenevanana, IHSM of Toliara, Madagascar; Jérôme Bourjea, Henri Grizel and Coralie Taquet, IFREMER, La Réunion, France; Sarah Humphrey Programme Afrique & Madagascar, WWF International; Jean- Paul Paddack, Bureau des projets pour l’ouest de l’Océan Indien, WWF International; Olivier Ralison Harifidy, Ramahaleo Tiana and Rémi Ratsimbazafy, WWF Madagascar & West Indian Ocean Programme Office; Jean Christophe Vié, Union mondiale pour la nature (UICN); Marc Hufty and Frank Muttenzer, Groupe de recherche sur l’environnement et la gouvernance (GREG), Institut Universitaire d’Etudes du Développement (IUED), Geneva, Switzerland. And a special thanks to Manfred Enstipp for his great help with English translation.
Aguirre, A.A., G. H. Balazs, B. Zimmerman & T.R. Spraker. 1994. FibropapillomasintheHawaiiangreenturtle:Searching for an etiologic agent. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation, February 23-27, 1993, Jeckyll Island, Georgia B. A. (comps. Schroeder &B.E.Witherington),p3. U.S.Dep.Commer.,NOAATech. Memo. NMFS-SEFSC-341.
Aguirre, A.A., G.H. Balazs, B. Zimmerman & F.D. Galey. 1994. Organic contaminants and trace metals in the tissues of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) afflicted with fibropapillomas in the Hawaiian Islands. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 28(2): 109-114.
Dailey, M.D. & R. Morris. 1995. Relationship of parasites (Trematoda: Spirorchidae) and their eggs to the occurrence of fibropapillomas in the green turtle (Chelonia mydas). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52(Suppl. 1): 84-89.
Foley, A. M., B. A. Schroeder, A. E. Redlow, K. J. Fick-Child & W.G. Teas. 2005. Fibropapillomatosis in stranded green turtles (Chelonia mydas) from the eastern United States (1980-98): Trends and associations with environmental factors. J. Wildl. Dis. 41(1): 29-41.
Greenblatt, R.J., T.M. Work, G.H. Balazs, C.A. Sutton, R.N. Casey & J.W. Casey. 2004. The Ozobranchus leech is a candidate mechanical vector for the fibropapilloma-associated turtle herpesvirus found latently infecting skin tumors on Hawaiian green turtles (Chelonia mydas). Virology 321:101- 110.
Landsberg, J.H., G.H. Balazs, K.A. Steidinger, D.G. Baden, T.M. Work & D.J. Russell. 1999. The potential role of natural tumor promoters in marine turtle fibropapillomatosis. J. Aquat.
Anim. Health 11:199-210.
Landsberg, J.H. 2002. The effects of harmful algal blooms on aquatic organisms. In: Reviews in Fisheries Science (ed. R.R. Stickney), 10(2):113-390. CRC Press.
Limpus, C.J. & J.D. Miller. 1994. The occurrence of cutaneous fibropapillomas in marine turtles in Queensland. In: Proceedings of the Australian Marine Turtle Conservation Workshop, 14-17 November 1990, p. 186-188. Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage and The Australian Nature Conservation Agency, Brisbane.
Murakawa, S.K.K., G.H. Balazs, D.M. Ellis, S. Hau, & S.M. Eames. 2000. Trends in fibropapillomatosis among green turtles stranded in the Hawaiian Islands. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Conservation and Biology, March 2-6, 1999, South Padre Island, Texas (comps. H. Kalb & T. Wibbels), p. 239-241 U.S. Dep. Commer. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-SEFSC-443.
Rakotonirina, B. 2008. Rapport sur le suivi des activités de ponte aux îles Barren, saison 2007-2008. IHSM.
Taquet, C., M. Taquet, T. Dempster, M. Soria, S. Ciccione, D. Roos & L. Dagorn. 2006. Foraging rhythms of the green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) on seagrass beds in N’Gouja Bay, Mayotte (Indian Ocean) determined by acoustic transmitters and listening stations. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Serv. 306: 295-302.
Tolojanahary, R. 2007. Pêche, migration et économie de consumation àAmpasimandroro, district de Maintirano. Région Melaky (ouest malagasy). Rapport de mission à Maintirano, 25 février – 7 avril 2007, 15 p.
OTHER USEFUL RESOURCES